By Zach Ingber
Although I took over 5 pages of notes at each of the meetings we attended or issue we discussed, I am still at an uncharacteristic loss for words. Etgar, the Hebrew word for “challenge”, really does push a teenager to new extremes. It encourages psychological expansion and exploration of young and vulnerable minds. I personally believe this idea as the mission statement for the summer journey of Etgar 36. This commitment to the future of our country is the set up for an influential, inspirational and, most importantly, controversial June 8th.
The United States of America is fueled on controversy and differences. Changes in society can only be achieved is there is someone to point out a flaw.
Our first meeting with Kaiser Permanente, a major health provider in just about every region of the country, really exposed the differences in opinion between the different participants of Etgar 36. This meeting was in response to watching Michael Moore’s “Sicko” earlier. Personally, I find that fantastic. We were escorted into a typical conference room with long tables and comfortable swivel chairs. Our speaker was a very elegant, poised and well dressed woman. While listening to her presentation, I began to think about something I saw in “Sicko”. Was she the heartless insurance agent that would turn down a dying person without blinking? Does she have regard for human life? Surprisingly, she admitted that the American health insurance system is flawed. Our speaker said, “I think there is some real unfairness when it comes to how individual health care is written.” Personally I agree with her statement but the meeting also solidified my stance that universal health care is not the response. I feel that quality will decrease, waiting time for appointments will increase, and doctor salaries will decrease which makes it harder for them to pay off the massive cost of medical school. Kaiser Permanente is a non-profit company which insures 12 million people. 96% of the billions of dollars in their revenue is used for overhead and health care. The remaining 4% is put back in the community or used for the advancement of business. Many felt that the entire 4% should be put back into the community. We discussed the policies that the two presidential candidates are putting forth and we were split over who we supported.

After leaving the office building, we went to the state Capitol which is officially located one mile above sea level. We had our group discussion on the issue of gay marriage to get us prepared for our meeting with the Colorado Family Institute. Our staff played devil’s advocate with everyone’s comments to make sure all sides were presented and understood. After all, a one sided discussion can’t take off from the ground.
We then had free time to roam around the 16th Street pedestrian mall in downtown. It is filled with shops and restaurants. We were able to shop, get lunch and just unwind after the talks this morning.
Then we went to Colorado Springs which has a very large conservative population as well as the headquarters for Focus on the Family. They set the agenda for the Religious Right. We met with Jim Pfaff, who runs the Colorado Family Institute which is affiliated with Focus on the Family. His institute is a Christian based conservative lobbying organization. They believe that life begins at conception, marriage is the unification of one man and one woman, are against Judicial activism, believe parents should be the first educators of children, and no sphere of life should prohibit the expression of religion.
Our discussion with him focused on the issue of gay marriage. Mr. Pfaff, being a lobbyist, is a brilliant orator. Although he had many points, his main point was that men and women bring different qualities to a marriage and that makes it ideal. Although I agree with his statement, I personally believe children raised by same sex parents can turn out as beneficial to society as babies raised by a heterosexual couple. Mr. Pfaff also felt that homosexuality is a choice and the burden of proof is on showing that it is not a choice. While many of us disagreed with Mr. Pfaff on many of his points, we were able to walk away admiring his oratory skills and that he took time to meet and speak frankly with a group in which he knew many would disagree with him. In the end we learned that you can agree to disagree.
We ended the day by visiting the red rock formation appropriately called “Garden of the Gods”. It was beautiful. We had our wrap up discussion there and then had a great time bowling. It was a great day filled with controversy, emotion, downtime and fun!
Recent Comments